Qui tam lawsuits let private individuals report fraud against the government and file legal claims under the False Claims Act. These cases allow whistleblowers, known as relators, to bring lawsuits on the government’s behalf and potentially receive a percentage of any money recovered. What are the requirements for a qui tam lawsuit? To succeed, whistleblowers need to meet specific legal standards, file their claims properly, and cooperate with government investigators. These cases play an important role in stopping waste and fraud that costs taxpayers billions of dollars each year.
Successful qui tam lawsuits have recovered billions for federal and state governments, and whistleblowers can sometimes receive between 15 and 30 percent of those recoveries. Read on to learn about who can bring a case, what kinds of fraud qualify, the key legal rules that apply, and how the process works. If you’ve seen possible fraud involving government money, you can contact a Florida employment lawyer near you for a free consultation.
Understanding the False Claims Act and Qui Tam Provisions
The False Claims Act dates back to the Civil War. Congress passed it in 1863 to fight fraud by suppliers who sold faulty goods to the Union Army. That law has grown into one of the most powerful tools the government uses to recover stolen funds and hold dishonest businesses accountable.
The qui tam provisions let private citizens sue on behalf of the government. This system encourages people with inside knowledge of fraud to speak up, even if they aren’t government employees. In return, whistleblowers may get a share of the money recovered.
Common fraud types reported through qui tam lawsuits include healthcare billing fraud, government contracting scams, and false claims for federal grant money. The U.S. Department of Justice reports that billions of dollars have been recovered through qui tam cases every year, with most of those started by whistleblowers.
Who Can File a Qui Tam Lawsuit?
Not everyone can bring a qui tam case. Only someone who meets certain legal rules can serve as the relator.
Requirements for Standing as a Relator
In a qui tam case, the person who reports the fraud is called a “relator.” To serve in this role, the relator must have firsthand knowledge or reliable information about the fraud.
Relators must often be the “original source” of the information. That means they didn’t just hear about the fraud secondhand or read about it in the news. Courts usually require that relators have direct and independent knowledge of the fraud and that they voluntarily provided that information to the government before filing the lawsuit.
The “public disclosure bar” may block a claim if the fraud has already been publicly revealed through media reports, lawsuits, or audits, unless the relator qualifies as an original source. This bar prevents multiple people from bringing claims based on the same set of facts already known to the public. How to Win in these situations often comes down to proving that you were the original source with direct and independent knowledge of the fraud, and that your information led to the government’s awareness or investigation.
Employee vs. Non-Employee Whistleblowers
Current employees often have the most direct knowledge of fraud. However, bringing a claim while still working for the company can involve certain risks, including retaliation. Federal law does offer protections in these cases, but timing and planning matter.
Former employees may also qualify to file a qui tam lawsuit. In some cases, they have fewer concerns about retaliation, and their separation from the company may allow for more freedom to work with attorneys and investigators.
People who never worked for the company can still bring a case if they have solid information. Auditors, consultants, and even competitors can sometimes qualify as relators if they meet the original source requirements.
What Types of Fraud Qualify for Qui Tam Actions?
Qui tam lawsuits apply to a wide range of fraud involving federal or state funds. Several industries see frequent claims due to the amount of government money involved.
Healthcare Fraud
Healthcare fraud makes up the largest share of qui tam recoveries. Common schemes include false billing to Medicare and Medicaid, billing for services not provided, or inflating the cost of services.
Kickbacks are another focus. Doctors, clinics, or hospitals might accept illegal payments in exchange for patient referrals or drug prescriptions. That behavior can violate both the False Claims Act and the Anti-Kickback Statute. What Are My Rights if you witness this? You may have the right to report the misconduct, file a qui tam lawsuit, and potentially receive a portion of any recovered funds—all while being protected from employer retaliation under federal law.
Drug companies may also face claims for promoting medications for unapproved uses or charging inflated prices to government programs.
Government Contracting Fraud
Contractors who do business with the Department of Defense, Department of Transportation, or other federal agencies must follow strict rules. When they overbill, supply substandard goods, or charge for work not done, they open themselves up to False Claims Act liability.
Infrastructure fraud is another target. Construction firms working on public roads, bridges, or buildings might cut corners, use cheap materials, or misreport progress to receive government funds they haven’t earned.
Grants and subsidies can also be misused. Fraud involving agriculture programs, research funds, or disaster relief grants has led to major qui tam cases.
Other Qualifying Fraud Types
Some lesser-known types of fraud also qualify. These include:
- Tax fraud, which involves customs violations or misreporting imported goods.
- Education funding fraud, such as inflating student numbers to get more federal money.
- Environmental fraud, where companies lie about compliance to get permits or funding.
Any false claim that results in an improper government payment may support a qui tam case.
Key Legal Requirements for Filing a Qui Tam Lawsuit
Qui tam lawsuits have specific rules. Meeting those requirements early on makes a big difference in how the case plays out.
The “Original Source” Requirement
To qualify as an original source, the relator must have direct and independent knowledge of the fraud. That often means firsthand observation, internal emails, or other insider documents.
Courts also require voluntary disclosure. The relator must give this information to the government before or at the same time as filing the qui tam lawsuit. Information discovered through court orders, media reports, or FOIA requests may not qualify. How to Deal with these requirements means acting quickly, documenting what you know, and working with a lawyer to make sure your claim meets all legal standards before you file.
Material False Claims Standard
The False Claims Act only applies when the fraud is material. That means it has to affect the government’s decision to pay the claim. For example, billing for services that never happened would meet this standard, while a small error in formatting may not.
Scienter, or knowledge of falsity, also matters. The relator must show that the person or company knew the claim was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
The false claim must also cause the government to make a payment. That link between the lie and the loss is key.
Statute of Limitations
Qui tam lawsuits must be filed on time. In general, the law allows six years from the date of the false claim or three years from when the government learns about it, whichever is later, up to a total of ten years.
If the government joins the case, its knowledge may affect the timing. That makes early action especially important.
How Does the Qui Tam Process Work?
Filing a qui tam case involves more than submitting a complaint. The process includes several steps that protect the government’s interests and give investigators time to review. Can I Still Sue if the government declines to intervene? Yes, you can. Whistleblowers are still permitted to move forward with the case independently, though these claims require more time, effort, and legal support.
Initial Filing and Seal Requirements
All qui tam lawsuits must be filed under seal. That means they are not made public right away. The relator must also serve a copy of the complaint and a written disclosure statement to the Department of Justice and the local U.S. Attorney’s Office.
During the sealed period, the relator must not talk about the lawsuit publicly. This gives the government time to investigate without tipping off the defendant.
Government Investigation Period
The government typically gets 60 days to review the case, though it often asks for more time. During this phase, the DOJ may interview the relator, review documents, and gather other evidence.
The government then decides whether to intervene in the case. If it intervenes, it takes over the lawsuit and leads the prosecution. If not, the relator may continue the case independently.
The relator works closely with their attorney during this period to support the investigation.
Post-Investigation Outcomes
If the government intervenes, it may settle with the defendant or proceed to trial. The relator still plays a role and may receive a share of any money recovered.
If the government declines to intervene, the relator can continue the case alone with their attorney. These cases are more difficult to pursue but can still succeed.
Some cases settle. Others go to trial. Timing, strength of the evidence, and pressure from regulators all influence the outcome.
What Are the Potential Rewards and Risks?
Bringing a qui tam case can lead to financial awards, but it also comes with risks. Whistleblowers should weigh these carefully with the help of a Florida employment lawyer.
Financial Rewards for Successful Cases
If the case succeeds, the relator may receive between 15 and 30 percent of the amount recovered. The exact percentage depends on factors like:
- How helpful the relator was during the case
- Whether the government intervened
- The quality and depth of the original information
Qui tam awards are considered taxable income. Whistleblowers should talk to tax professionals to plan ahead.
Risks and Challenges
Retaliation from an employer or colleagues remains a real concern. The False Claims Act includes protections for whistleblowers, including job reinstatement, back pay, and other damages.
Legal costs can also add up, especially in cases without government intervention. However, many whistleblower attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning they only get paid from a successful recovery.
Defendants may also file counterclaims for defamation, breach of contract, or other alleged wrongs. These claims can usually be defended successfully, but they add pressure to the process. How to Protect Yourself during this time includes working closely with your lawyer, avoiding public statements, and keeping detailed records of your communications and actions.
How Our Attorneys Can Help
Brenton Legal works with whistleblowers throughout Florida to hold fraudsters accountable. Our attorneys assist with every step of the process.
Comprehensive Case Evaluation
We start with a confidential consultation to assess the fraud and discuss legal options. If the case meets the standards for a qui tam lawsuit, we’ll walk through the timing and filing process.
Expert Legal Representation
Our team has handled many successful qui tam lawsuits. We understand the government’s procedures, how to present evidence, and when to push for government intervention.
We know how to build strong cases, gather documents, and communicate with investigators to move the case forward.
Protection Throughout the Process
We support whistleblowers from the first meeting to the final outcome. That includes handling retaliation concerns, keeping your identity protected, and making sure you’re informed throughout the case.
Why Choose Our Firm?
Brenton Legal provides clients with strategic, experienced representation in qui tam actions.
Proven Track Record
Our attorneys have helped clients recover significant amounts through False Claims Act lawsuits. Many of our cases led to government intervention and high-dollar settlements.
Extensive Knowledge
We know the False Claims Act inside and out. Our team understands fraud across industries, including healthcare, defense contracting, and education. We work closely with government agencies and know what they need to pursue a case.
Client-Focused Approach
We offer contingency fee agreements so you don’t have to worry about paying out of pocket. We stay in contact, answer your questions, and make sure your rights stay protected from start to finish.
Frequently Asked Questions About Qui Tam Claims
Can I file a qui tam lawsuit if I’ve already reported the fraud internally?
Yes. Internal reporting does not prevent you from filing a qui tam case. However, waiting too long can reduce your ability to recover a reward or may block your claim if someone else files first.
What if the government doesn’t intervene in my case?
You can still proceed with the case on your own. Some successful recoveries come from non-intervened cases, though they may require more effort and resources.
How long does a qui tam lawsuit typically take?
Many cases take several years from start to finish. Government reviews often last more than a year. Settlement talks or trials can add more time depending on the case.
Are there protections against retaliation for filing a qui tam lawsuit?
Yes. The False Claims Act prohibits retaliation. If you lose your job, get demoted, or suffer other harm, you may have a separate claim for damages. Can You Sue your employer for this kind of retaliation? Yes, you may be able to file a separate legal action to recover lost wages, emotional distress damages, and even punitive damages depending on the facts of your case.
Contact Our Employment Law Attorneys in FL for Help
If you’ve witnessed fraud involving government money, talk to a Florida employment lawyer before taking action. Timing, evidence, and legal strategy all affect how a qui tam case unfolds.
Brenton Legal offers a free case evaluation to discuss your situation. Don’t wait too long. Other whistleblowers may act first, and delays could affect your eligibility for financial rewards.
Contact us today to speak with a Florida employment lawyer and learn more about your legal options.
Ryan Brenton
Ryan Brenton, the founding partner of Brenton Legal PA, is a distinguished employment lawyer with a profound experience in a variety of employment disputes. His practice encompasses complex litigation, wage and hour class action cases, and discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims. Representing a diverse clientele, from minimum wage workers to executives, Ryan has successfully argued cases in both state and federal courts, as well as in administrative proceedings. His legal acumen has earned him a national reputation and respect from clients and peers alike. A graduate of Nova Southeastern University, Shepard Broad Law Center, and holding a B.S. in Economics from Florida Atlantic University, Ryan's legal prowess is underpinned by a solid educational foundation. His commitment to justice and fairness in the workplace marks him as a trusted advocate in the field of employment law.
Read More Articles By Ryan Brenton